Explaining the governance proposal, part 1
James Bradley <<jb183>>
writes:
For more than a year USHPA's strategic planning committee has been
evolving the proposal youve been reading about, to restructure the organization
for the next 20 years. While these efforts have developed a steadily stronger
proposal, one that now reflects the input of the members as well as all but one
of the current directors (one declined to speak with us), there is now some
misinformation going around. For instance, there has never been a draft where four director votes would be
able to pass a motion. In the final version, the one that the members will be
voting on, there are ten directors, and it takes six votes to pass a motion,
regardless of how many are in attendance. The law says we have to define a
quorum anyway, so weve set the quorum also to six, meaning that if only the
quorum is present a motion must be unanimous to pass. Please read the proposal for yourself, rather than believing what you read or
hear. Check back also on the section full arguments from current directors and
committee chairs, as more continue to get posted. www.ushpa.org/member/governance-proposal-2018
https://OzReport.com/1544707134
|